Science-led AI systems laboratoryEngland / 2026

Intelligence,armoured.

We investigate how AI systems reason, make decisions and demonstrate what they have done. Our research connects invention, governed inference, verifiable evidence and human oversight through working prototypes and testable ideas.

Science-led engineering: explicit models, testable hypotheses and evidence you can inspect.

The Scorpion Labs mark
INVENTION · INFERENCE · PROOF

Models. Experiments. Evidence.

Our work draws on decision theory, Bayesian inference, optimisation and formal reasoning. We make assumptions explicit, test behaviour and use evidence to challenge the model. The maths earns its place by explaining a real engineering decision.

01 / OPTIMISATION

Choose within constraints.

x* = arg max U(x), x ∈ E(policy)

OpenScorpion’s routing problem starts with an eligible set. Within it, utility makes quality, cost and latency trade-offs explicit. The weights express priorities; they need evaluation against actual outcomes.

02 / BAYESIAN REASONING

Update with evidence.

p(θ | D) ∝ p(D | θ) p(θ)

Bayesian reasoning makes the relationship between prior assumptions and new observations explicit. It informs how we think about uncertain claims and model performance; a probability still needs calibration and testing.

03 / GRAPHS & VERIFICATION

Preserve the argument.

G = (V, E) · h = H(evidence)

Graphs represent claims, evidence and conflicts; hashes bind a record to specific material. These ideas underpin our work on compliance and traceable delivery. A valid signature checks integrity, while the underlying evidence still needs scrutiny.

An answer is only the start.

The hard part is making it usable and accountable.

Real problems. Working projects.

Each project tackles a different point where AI needs evidence, judgement and control. These are active development efforts; specific capabilities and readiness vary.

01
Patent StudioToward private beta

How do you turn an invention into a reviewable patent draft?

A workspace for invention records, prior-art research, claim development, drawings and counsel review. Outputs retain their source evidence and review history.

Prior art · claims · evidence
Request a private briefing
Patent Studio invention intake screen with disclosure and source fieldsView full-size
Repository development capture · invention intake. Describe the invention, attach source material or continue an existing draft.
02
OpenScorpionActive research

Which model should handle this request — and why?

We are building a routing layer between applications and model providers: apply policy first, compare eligible routes, and retain the decision evidence. The problem is balancing answer quality, spend and response time without losing control.

Policy → eligible models → route → decision record
Explore the repository
Recorded demo · real requests on our R740 VM, with policy enforcement and signed evidence. Local inference: $0 metered token rate, excluding hardware and electricity.
03
APCGActive development

Can a compliance decision be checked outside the system?

We are building policy evaluation and signed evidence bundles across an engine, platform, review UI and independent verifier. The aim is to preserve what was checked, which policy applied and who approved it.

Policy → evidence → decision → independent verification
Discuss the project
APCG policy graph showing a code-release decision, evidence and verification checksView full-size
Repository reference-data capture · software-delivery policy graph. Trace a decision through its policy, controls and bound evidence.
04
AriadneActive research

How do you know an agent actually finished the job?

Ariadne connects agent activity with repository work, tests, reviews and delivery evidence. The private console tracks connected Macs and VMs, including work before a PR exists. We are extending that visibility to cloud agents and bot workers.

Orchestration · evidence · human review
Explore the repository
Workflow illustration

From agent activity to work you can review.

Follow the change. Inspect the evidence. Keep the decision with a person.

  1. 01 / OBSERVE
    See the work

    Connect agent activity on Macs and VMs to the repository, even before a pull request exists.

    Agent · workspace · branch
  2. 02 / TRACE
    Follow the evidence

    Bring code changes, pull requests, tests and reviews into the same delivery story.

    Change · checks · review
  3. 03 / REVIEW
    Know what needs attention

    Inspect the supporting evidence and outstanding checks before deciding the work is complete.

    Evidence · human judgement

A continuous thread of evidence. Activity is the starting point. Reviewable delivery is the goal.

Illustrative workflow · shows how Ariadne connects activity and evidence, rather than live task status or measured results.

Technical ideas, made tangible.

A bit of fun alongside the main research: daily interactive experiments in maths, physics and computing. Explore an idea, adjust the parameters and see the behaviour for yourself.

Preview of The Maze That Solves Itself: cells that only see their neighbours find the way out

The Maze That Solves Itself: cells that only see their neighbours find the way out

No tile can see the whole maze. Each one only checks the four tiles touching it and says: I am one step further than my closest neighbour. A wave floods out, the maze rises into a staircase, and the way out is just 'walk downhill'. Smash it and it heals.

Explore the demo
Visit Interesting X — all experiments

An informal series driven by curiosity. The latest experiment updates automatically from the published Interesting X collection.

Explore a research question with us.

We welcome researchers, engineers and collaborators working on invention systems, governed inference, verifiable decisions and the behaviour of AI agents.

Discuss the research